SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Praveen Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of GNCT of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. seeking quashing of fir (Para 3)
2. amicable settlement negates prosecution (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. quashing fir due to settled relationship (Para 9)
4. court quashes fir based on facts (Para 10)
5. petition allowed and disposed of (Para 11)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

Crl. M.A. 9898/2021

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C.1449/2021

3. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction for quashing of FIR No.92/2017 dated 04.09.2017 registered at Police Station Chitranjan Park and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

4. Notice issued.

5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for respondent no.2/respondent no.2 present in person and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 05.12.2007 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately.

7. Petitioners and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top