SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Subhash – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. bail application facts and history. (Para 1 , 3)
2. arguments regarding bail and evidence. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's reasoning against bail application. (Para 6 , 7 , 9)
4. legal factors influencing bail decision. (Para 8)
5. conclusion and future bail application. (Para 10 , 11)

ORDER

1. This application filed under Section 4 39 Cr.P.C. is for grant of regular bail in FIR No.460/2016 dated 16.05.2016 registered in Police Station Hauz Khas under Sections 376 , 342, 354D IPC and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 (for short `POCSO Act').

2. Heard Mr. Naveen Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, learned APP appearing for the State.

3. The petitioner is accused of having committed rape on a minor girl. The complaint was filed on 16.05.2016. The petitioner was arrested on the same date. The petitioner got bail on 18.05.2016 from Juvenile Justice Board-II, Delhi. Since the petitioner was not a minor on the date of the offence, the case was transferred to the regular court and the petitioner was taken into custody on 03.09.2016 and since then he is stated to be in judicial custody.

4. Mr. Na

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top