SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Campbell Restaurant Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Aria Hotels and Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. court appoints an arbitrator by consent of parties. (Para 1)
2. court does not express opinion on merits. (Para 2)
3. all petitions disposed of as stated. (Para 3)
4. pending applications disposed of. (Para 4)

ORDER (Oral)

(Video-Conferencing)

C. Hari Shankar, J. After some arguments, these petitions are disposed of, by consent between learned counsel for the parties, in the following terms:

(i) This Court appoints Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sistani, a retired Judge of this Court, whose name was suggested, ad idem, by learned counsel for both parties, as the arbitrator, to arbitrate on the disputes between the petitioner and the respondent. The fees of the learned arbitrator would be settled by the learned arbitrator in consultation with the parties.

(ii) All disputes between the parties are permitted to be referred to the learned arbitrator, whether in the nature of claims or counterclaims. The learned arbitrator would furnish the requisite disclosure under Section 12(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to "the 1996 Act"), within a period of one week of entering on the reference. The contact details of the learned arbitrator are as u

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top