DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Campbell Restaurant Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Aria Hotels and Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court appoints an arbitrator by consent of parties. (Para 1) |
| 2. court does not express opinion on merits. (Para 2) |
| 3. all petitions disposed of as stated. (Para 3) |
| 4. pending applications disposed of. (Para 4) |
(Video-Conferencing)
C. Hari Shankar, J. After some arguments, these petitions are disposed of, by consent between learned counsel for the parties, in the following terms:
(i) This Court appoints Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sistani, a retired Judge of this Court, whose name was suggested, ad idem, by learned counsel for both parties, as the arbitrator, to arbitrate on the disputes between the petitioner and the respondent. The fees of the learned arbitrator would be settled by the learned arbitrator in consultation with the parties.
(ii) All disputes between the parties are permitted to be referred to the learned arbitrator, whether in the nature of claims or counterclaims. The learned arbitrator would furnish the requisite disclosure under Section 12(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to "the 1996 Act"), within a period of one week of entering on the reference. The contact details of the learned arbitrator are as u
The arbitration process is governed by mutual consent, allowing parties to appoint an arbitrator and seek interim relief under Sections 12(2) and 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The court affirmed that parties can mutually consent to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, with obligations on the arbitrator to ensure expeditious resolution of disputes.
The court appointed an arbitrator to resolve disputes between parties, emphasizing adherence to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act procedures.
Parties may appoint an arbitrator by mutual agreement, leading to dispute resolution under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing the need for adherence to due process.
The court affirmed that arbitration agreements and interim procedures must adhere to the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, highlighting the importance of party consent in reso....
The court appointed a retired judge to arbitrate disputes between parties, allowing all issues to remain open for decision under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The court appointed an arbitrator for disputes under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, affirming the parties' agreement on arbitration without addressing the merits of the controversy.
The court affirms the validity of the arbitration agreement and appoints an arbitrator as the parties consented to resolve disputes via arbitration.
The court's decision emphasized the appointment of an arbitrator and the allowance of all contentions to be urged and contested in the arbitral proceedings.
Disputes under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act can be referred to arbitration with both parties' agreement, confirming the maintainability of applications before the arbitrator.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.