Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
National Research Development Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Saveer Biotech Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks appointment of arbitrator. (Para 1) |
| 2. no objection from respondent for arbitration. (Para 2) |
| 3. existence of arbitration agreement and disputes mentioned. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. appointment and fees of arbitrator determined. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 5. petition disposed of. (Para 8) |
C. Hari Shankar, J.
ARB.P. 289/2020
1. This is a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("1996 Act"), to appoint an arbitrator to arbitrate on the disputes between the parties.
2. Mr. Sanjay Sudan, the Director of the respondent, who appears in person, submits that he has no objection to the disputes being referred to arbitration.
3. The arbitration clause in the agreement executed between the parties reads as under:
"15. ARBITRATION AND JURISDICTION
(a) If any dispute or difference arises between the parties hereto as to the construction, interpretation, effect and implication of any provision of this Agreement Including the rights or liabilities or any claim or demand of any Party (or its extent) against other party or its sub-contractor or in regard to any matter under these presents but excluding any matters, decisions or determin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
