Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Striker Beverages Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
India Tourism Development Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks arbitration appointment (Para 1) |
| 2. respondent agrees to arbitration with conditions (Para 2) |
| 3. court appoints arbitrator and details process (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. petition dismissed without costs, issues open (Para 7) |
(Video-Conferencing)
1. Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, submits that his client would be satisfied if an arbitrator, to arbitrate on the disputes between the parties, is appointed by this Court and this petition is permitted to be treated as an application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1996 Act"), to be decided by the learned arbitrator in accordance with law.
2. Mr. Malhotra, learned counsel for the respondents, has no objection to the dispute being referred to arbitration, with the clear caveat that all issues be kept open for arguments before the learned arbitrator.
3. In view thereof, this petition is disposed of by appointing Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Ramamoorthy, a learned retired Judge of this Court (Mob: 9810529889), as the arbitrator to arbitrate on the dispute between the parties.
4. The present petition is p
The court appointed a retired judge to arbitrate disputes between parties, allowing all issues to remain open for decision under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The court affirmed that parties can mutually consent to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, with obligations on the arbitrator to ensure expeditious resolution of disputes.
Parties may appoint an arbitrator by mutual agreement, leading to dispute resolution under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing the need for adherence to due process.
The court permitted a petition to be treated as an application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to be decided by the arbitrator.
The court appointed an arbitrator to resolve disputes as per the arbitration clause in the agreement, emphasizing that the parties are bound to arbitrate their disagreements.
Appointment of an arbitrator in instances where the respondent does not object to arbitration is valid under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing the importance of efficient dispute reso....
The arbitration process is governed by mutual consent, allowing parties to appoint an arbitrator and seek interim relief under Sections 12(2) and 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The court appointed an arbitrator to resolve disputes between parties, emphasizing adherence to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act procedures.
The court appointed an arbitrator for disputes under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, affirming the parties' agreement on arbitration without addressing the merits of the controversy.
Parties agreed to refer disputes to arbitration under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; interim directions remain operational until arbitrator's decision.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
