Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, JYOTI SINGH
Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's jurisdiction and parties' dissatisfaction with previous orders. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the learned single judge's order. (Para 3) |
| 3. summary of the implications and timing regarding admission. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. disposal of the appeal with observations. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)
CM APPL.2439/2021 (exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application is disposed of.
LPA 33/2021
1. Being aggrieved and feeling dissatisfied by the order dated 22nd December, 2020 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 12734/2019 (Annexure A-1 to the memo of this appeal), the present appeal has been preferred by the original petitioner.
2. We have heard the learned counsels for both the sides and looked into the facts and circumstances of the case. The appellant is the original petitioner in the writ petition, wherein he has sought directions to consider his case for admission in AIIMS/respondent No.2 for the MBBS Course 2019 as well as to declare the OBC certificate dated 02.07.2019 furnished by the petitioner, as valid. From a reading of the impugned order, it is evident that the present appeal has been preferred challenging an orde
An appeal is not maintainable without a substantive order from the lower court; adjournment does not equate to a decision on rights or liabilities.
An appeal is not maintainable if no rights or liabilities have been adjudicated upon, thereby necessitating resolution of the underlying writ petition urgently.
Denial of EWS reservation in admission violates constitutional provisions; interim orders do not finalize rights, thus appealing them lacks merit.
The court upheld the maximum 8-year period for completing the MBBS course, ruling that no interim relief could be granted due to absence of a prima facie case.
Courts may direct admission increases in exceptional cases but must uphold consistent admission standards across institutions, even amidst procedural changes due to emergencies.
A prolonged delay in prosecuting a writ petition can justify dismissal, reflecting a lack of diligence and warranting costs against the Appellant.
The cut-off date for qualifying examinations in educational admissions is binding as per the prospectus, and delays due to external factors do not alter established eligibility requirements.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
