Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, JYOTI SINGH
Management Education and Research Institute – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. urgency of intake reduction in bca course. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. court’s observations on hearing limitations. (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. appeal disposed without merit opinion. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
D.N. Patel, CJ. (Oral)--Proceedings have been conducted through video conferencing.
CM APPL.47645/2021 (exemptions)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application is disposed of.
LPA 515/2021 & CM APPL.47644/2021 (stay)
1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original Petitioners in W.P.(C) 12539/2021. The Appellants are aggrieved by an order of adjournment dated 21st December, 2021 (Annexure A-1 to the memo of this appeal), passed by the learned Single Judge in CM Application No.41343/2021 in W.P.(C) 12539/2021.
2. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the Appellants and looked into the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. The impugned order dated 21st December, 2021 passed by the learned Single Judge reads as under:-
"It is not possible to hear the matter today due to paucity of time.
List on 24.01.2022."
4. It is an undisputed position that the writ petition is pending before the Learned Single Judge and is listed for hearing on 24th Janua
An appeal is not maintainable if no rights or liabilities have been adjudicated upon, thereby necessitating resolution of the underlying writ petition urgently.
An appeal is not maintainable without a substantive order from the lower court; adjournment does not equate to a decision on rights or liabilities.
Denial of EWS reservation in admission violates constitutional provisions; interim orders do not finalize rights, thus appealing them lacks merit.
An interim order can be upheld while expediting hearing in a related writ petition without addressing the substantive merits of the case.
Letters Patent Appeals are untenable if no rights or liabilities of parties are decided in the impugned order.
Court addressed procedural delays in hearings and clarified that opinions on merits were not expressed in the disposal of the appeal.
The legal principle established is that sympathy cannot be the basis for a court order, and a party must demonstrate a prima facie case for interference in a service matter.
The court's decision was based on the understanding of the predicament involved and the specific instruction given by the Counsel on record to the Junior Counsel not to argue the matter.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
