SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Anuj Vohra - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P. (C) 1007 of 2021, CM Appl. 2754 of 2021
Decided On : 27-01-2021




The court confirmed the right to verify eligibility for pro rata pension, mandating payments and establishing procedures for denied claims.

Headnote:(A) Indian Air Force - Pro Rata Pension - The petitioner seeks similar relief as in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, involving pro rata pension claims. (Paras 2-5)

(B) Right to verification - The respondents' obligation to verify the petitioner's eligibility for pro rata pension within a fixed timeline was emphasized. (Paras 5-6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner claims to be in similar circumstances as other petitioners seeking pro rata pension and has submitted the necessary No Objection Certificate.

Findings of Court:
The court directed that if the petitioner is found eligible for pro rata pension, arrears must be paid within twelve weeks with interest accruing on any delays.

Issues: The key issue was the eligibility of the petitioner for pro rata pension and the determination of a similar standing with other petitioners.

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed that timely verification must occur and that any denial of pension should be communicated with reasons, thereby ensuring transparency and the opportunity for further action if necessary.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's claim for pro rata pension based on previous cases. (Para 2 , 3)
2. verification rights and appeal provisions acknowledged. (Para 4)
3. order for payment of pro rata pension contingent on verification. (Para 5)
4. interest on unpaid pension arrears and order dissemination. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner in this petition claims to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificate (NOC) has been filed along with the petition.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.

5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioner to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant him the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioner. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioner, for any reason, is not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioner, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioner shall be entitled to take further remedies there against.

6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top