SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Pratap Chandra Mallik (Ex CPL 742642) - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 8381 of 2021 & C.M. No. 25930 of 2021
Decided On : 13-08-2021




The court established that procedural verification is necessary for pension claims, ensuring fairness and timely payments to eligible individuals.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, and 21 - Petition for pro rata pension - The petitioner claims to be similarly placed as other petitioners and seeks relief of pro rata pension - Respondents directed to verify eligibility and grant payment if found entitled within 12 weeks. (Paras 2, 5)

(B) Right to verification - The right of appeal to the Supreme Court is saved, indicating procedural fairness in decision-making. (Paras 4, 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner claims entitlement to pro rata pension similar to findings in prior judgments regarding pension eligibility. Necessary No Objection Certificates (NOCs) have been provided by the petitioner.

Findings of Court:
The court disposed of the petition, mandating verification of the petitioner's eligibility for pro rata pension and timely payment if applicable.

Issues: The primary issues addressed include the petitioner's eligibility for pension in light of prior cases and procedural compliance by the respondents.

Ratio Decidendi: The court underscored the need for procedural fairness and verification before pension disbursement, emphasizing that if the petitioner doesn’t qualify, reasons must be communicated for potential further legal remedies.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. similar entitlement claims for pension (Para 2 , 3)
2. right to verification and appeal retained (Para 4)
3. directions for pension payment and verification (Para 5 , 6)
4. order to be publically available and communicated (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner in the present petition claims to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) had been given.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.

5. Accordingly, the present petition along with pending application is disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioner to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant him the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioner. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioner, for any reason, is not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioner, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioner shall be entitled to take further remedies there against. Needless to state that if any documents are asked for by the respondents, the same shall be furnished by the petitioner within a week.

6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top