SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Pritam Singh, EX CPL 709111-L - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 8703 of 2021 & C.M. No. 27089 of 2021
Decided On : 23-08-2021




Verification of pension entitlement must align with precedents, ensuring petitioner receives due process and fair assessment based on comparability to similar cases.

Headnote:(A) Pension Scheme - Principles governing grant of pro rata pension - Petitioner claims entitlement to pro rata pension similarly as other petitions disposed of in specific cases - Court held that if verified as similarly placed, petitioner entitled to relief as per prior judgments. (Paras 2-5)

(B) Administrative Procedures - Requirement for verification and communication of reasons for denial if applicable - Court emphasized procedural fairness in pension determinations by the Indian Air Force. (Paras 5-6)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner, claiming right to pro rata pension, cites comparable cases and confirms necessary No Objection Certificates are provided.

Findings of Court:
Respondents directed to grant pro rata pension if entitled within defined duration; if not entitled, reasons must be given.

Issues: Determination of eligibility based on comparability to other petitioners and procedural adherence for communication of reasons.

Ratio Decidendi: Court affirmed that verification for pension entitlement must follow precedents and decisive judgments, ensuring procedural fairness in handling the petitioner's claims.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. claim for pro rata pension based on prior judgments. (Para 2 , 3)
2. consent to verify and appeal against prior judgments. (Para 4)
3. order for verification and potential response upon denial. (Para 5)
4. interest on unpaid arrears and directive for order dissemination. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner in the present wit petition claims to be similarly placed to the petitioner in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and Others, connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) had been given.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.

5. Accordingly, the petition along with pending application is disposed of directing the respondent Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioner to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions (supra) to grant him the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioner. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioner, for any reason, is not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar and other connected petitions (supra) being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioner, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioner shall be entitled to take further remedies there against. Needless to state that if any documents are asked for by the respondents, the same shall be furnished by the petitioner within a week.

6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top