Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Paras Khuttan – Appellant
Versus
Gail (India) Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for refund of resignation notice pay. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. decision and communications regarding resignation acceptance. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. arguments regarding notice period for probationers. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. counterarguments on representation and policies. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. court's observations on relevant rules and applicability. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. finding on criteria for resignation formalities. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 7. discussion on doctrine of estoppel. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 8. implications of prior conduct and legal precedents. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 9. differentiation of legal cases by context. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 10. conclusion on the dismissal of the petition. (Para 45) |
JUDGMENT
1. By way of the present writ petition, Petitioner assails the letter dated 03.07.2020, whereby representation of the Petitioner dated 27.05.2020 seeking refund of Rs.1,74,253/- was rejected and he was informed that since the Petitioner had failed to give the required notice before tendering resignation and the money sought to be recovered was paid in lieu of the two months' notice, he was not
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
