Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Gujarat Gas Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. gujarat gas challenges aptel's stay order (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner justifies pngrb's order under the act (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. gail argues aptel's stay is justified (Para 7) |
| 4. court critiques pngrb's lack of reasoning (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. court directs aptel to expedite adjudication (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. petition disposed in above terms (Para 13) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.
2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner - Gujarat Gas Limited, challenging the impugned order dated 26th August, 2020 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (hereinafter "APTEL").
3. APTEL, vide the impugned order, has stayed the proceedings before the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (hereinafter "PNGRB") and has also stayed the impugned order, dated 21st July, 2020 passed by PNGRB. By the impugned order a temporary injunction was passed against Respondent No. 3 - GAIL (India) Limited (hereinafter "GAIL"), directing said party to not supply gas to any customer having requirement of natural gas upto 50,000 SCMD within the geographical area of Dahej-Vagra Taluka. The order of the PNGRB dated 21st July
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
