SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Vijay Kumar Shukla - Appellant
Versus
Government of NCT of Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 2278 of 2021
Decided On : 18-02-2021




The court permits the petitioner to apply for a new electricity connection, emphasizing no special rights are granted and the existing rights and contentions of the parties remain intact.

Headnote:(A) Electricity Act, 2003 - Restoration of electricity connection - Petitioner sought directions to restore electricity connection despite no pending bills, citing multiple complaints against reconnection, and submitted willingness to apply for a new connection - Respondent outlined requirement for additional security deposit due to past defaults. (Paras 3-8)

(B) Rights of Parties - The directive for applying for a new connection does not create special equities for the petitioner; rights and contentions of both parties remain intact. (Paras 11-12)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner, after being a tenant, entered into an Agreement to Sell with the landlord and sought reconnection of electricity which had been disconnected despite no pending bills, citing complaints lodged against reconnection.

Findings of Court:
The petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to apply for an independent connection and the respondent must process the application within stipulated time.

Issues: The main issues include the validity of complaints against reconnection and the petitioner’s ability to obtain a new connection.

Ratio Decidendi: The court allowed the petitioner to apply for an electricity connection, emphasizing that granting the connection does not confer any special rights and the matter should be processed expeditiously if all conditions are met.

Result: Petition disposed of.

Table of Content
1. petition for restoration of electricity connection. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. conditions for electricity reconnection and petitioner's undertaking. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. court's order for processing the application. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. finality and procedures regarding the order. (Para 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (ORAL)

CM APPL.6610/2021(exemption)

1. Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 2278/2021 & CM APPL.6609/2021

2. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

3. Petitioner seeks a direction to respondent/BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. to restore the electricity connection. It is contended that even though no bills are pending, electricity supply has been disconnected.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that when the petitioner applied for restoration of the electricity connection, same has not been allowed stating that the multiple complaints have been received from the owners of the premises/registered consumer against the re-connection of the meter in the said premises. Petitioner has been required to provide valid Lease Deed for further connection.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though petitioner was originally a tenant in the premises, subsequently there was an Agreement to Sell between the petitioner and the landlord. It is submitted that it is not in dispute that the petitioner is in possession of the subject property. He submits that he is willing to apply for a fresh connection in his own name.

6. Learned counsel appearing for respondent/BSES-RPL submits that apart from regular security deposit, petitioner shall also have to pay additional security deposit of Rs.5,000/-.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner is agreeable for the said deposit.

8. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the petitioner had in the past defaulted in payment of the regular electricity bills.

9. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, undertakes that petitioner shall duly pay the bills raised by the respondent from time to time.

10. The undertaking is accepted.

11. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to apply for an independent electricity connection in his own name. On an application being filed by the petitioner, respondent no.1 shall expeditiously process the application and if the application is in order and all commercial and other formalities are completed, electricity connection shall be granted within two working days. It would not be obligatory on the part of the petitioner to furnish a No Objection Certificate from respondent no.2.

12. It is clarified that this order as well as grant of an electricity connection shall not grant any special equities in favour of the petitioner and same would be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties.

13. The Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

14. Copy of the Order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top