SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Gurkirpal Singh - Appellant
Versus
BSES Rajdhani Power Limited - Respondent
W.P.(C) 12064 of 2021
Decided On : 03-02-2022




A tenant can receive a separate electricity connection without the landlord's No Objection Certificate provided formalities are met, affirming protection under tenancy laws.

Headnote:(A) Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Section 45 - Tenant seeking separate independent electricity connection - Petition allowed for the grant of a pre-paid electricity connection by BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. to the tenant without requiring a No Objection Certificate from the landlord, provided the petitioner complies with codal and financial formalities. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a tenant, sought an independent electricity connection after a dispute with the landlord over electricity disconnection and bills, prompting him to file a petition under the Rent Act and receive interim relief for restoration of electricity. (Paras 3, 4, 5)

Findings of Court:
The Court found that while the landlord previously interrupted electricity supply, the utility company had no objections to providing the connection upon compliance with requisite formalities. (Paras 8, 9)

Issues: Whether the tenant is entitled to a separate electricity connection without the landlord's No Objection Certificate.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the tenant could receive an independent electricity connection without the landlord’s consent, emphasizing that this provision does not alter existing rights concerning property possession. (Paras 8, 9)

Result: Petition allowed in terms stipulated.

Table of Content
1. tenant seeks independent electricity connection (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding tenant's rights and landlord's obligations (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court directs provision of electricity subject to compliance (Para 8 , 9)
4. conclusion and order of the court (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)--The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. By order dated 26.10.2021, notices were directed to be issued to respondent No.2. Office report indicates that notices were sent over Whatsapp. However, none appears for respondent No.2.

3. Petitioner, a tenant in the subject property seeks a separate independent electricity connection at premises being shop No.1 in property number 1868/13, Govind Puri Extension, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a tenant protected under the Delhi Rent Control Act. He submits that earlier electricity was sought to be disconnected by the respondent No.2 and accordingly, a petition under Section 45 of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 was filed in which by interim dated 08.04.2021, the respondent/landlord was directed to restore electricity to the tenanted premises.

5. Learned counsel submits that though electricity has been restored, however, with the intention of pressurizing the petitioner to vacate the premises, the landlord does not pay the electricity bills on time or permit the electricity inspectors to inspect the meter and take reading.

6. He submits that petitioner is willing to comply with all the codal and financial formalities of the respondent for the purposes of grant of the electricity connection.

7. Learned counsel appearing for respondent/BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. submits that they have no objection to grant of an independent electricity meter to the petitioner, subject to petitioner complying with the codal and other financial formalities.

8. In view of the above, this petition is allowed. Subject to petitioner completing the codal and other financial formalities, BSES/Rajdhani Power Ltd. is directed to provide a pre-paid electricity connection to the petitioner without insisting upon a No Objection Certificate from the landlord.

9. It is clarified that the provision of electricity meter shall be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties and shall not grant any special equity in favour of the petitioner or any extra rights in the property other than what the petitioner already enjoys

10. Petition is allowed, in the above terms.

11. Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through e-mail by the Court Master.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top