Ashish Gupta vs Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Ashish Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited – Respondent

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks electricity restoration. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. conditions for new electricity connection. (Para 6)
3. electricity as a fundamental right. (Para 7)
4. court’s order for electricity connection. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)

1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner seeks a direction to respondent/Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited (TPDDL) to either restore the electricity supply to CA No.60019111651 or install a fresh connection in the third floor of property number 83, Tagore Park, New Delhi-110009.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a tenant in the subject property, though there are certain disputes between the petitioner and landlord.

4. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner had filed a suit for mandatory injunction seeking restoration of electricity connection. However, the said suit was rejected on the ground that there is a suit for possession filed by the landlord against the property and the relief of restoration of electricity could be agitated in the said proceedings.

5. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for respondent.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document