SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Aviral Bhatla - Appellant
Versus
South Delhi Municipal Corporation - Respondent
W.P(C) 2323 of 2021 & CM Appls. 6770-71 of 2021
Decided On : 23-02-2021




The court upheld the principle of due process, granting a temporary stay on demolition orders pending resolution of the pending appeal before the Appellate Tribunal.

Headnote:(A) Municipal Corporation Act - Jurisdiction of Appellate Tribunal - Vacation and demolition orders - Petitioner challenged vacation notices and demolition order on grounds of deviation from sanctioned building plan - Court noted petitioner had an appeal pending before Appellate Tribunal MCD, which had not been heard due to closure during lockdown, and ordered a stay on demolition for two weeks post-tribunal resumption. (Paras 2, 4, 8, 9)

Findings of Court:
The ongoing pandemic prevented the hearing of the petitioner's appeal; hence a temporary stay on demolition was warranted.

Issues: The court considered whether procedural protections should be afforded while awaiting an appeal decision from the Appellate Tribunal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the right to due process and granted a stay on demolition, pending the appeal's consideration, allowing the Appellate Tribunal to rule without bias.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. petitioner challenges vacation notices and demolition order. (Para 1 , 2)
2. appellant argues based on previously filed appeal and lockdown impacts. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court grants temporary protection during appeal process. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. court concludes with order for appeal and notification. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (ORAL)

1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner impugns vacation notices dated 11.02.2020, 01.02.2021 and demolition order dated 04.12.2019.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the action seems to have been taken based on some building plan dated 03.12.2010. He submits that the property has been constructed as per sanctioned plan dated 17.05.2000.

4. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has already filed an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal MCD which was listed on 11.03.2020 when notice was issued to the Corporation, returnable for 11.03.2020 and as none appeared for the Corporation on 11.03.2020 and the matter was adjourned to 24.03.2020 directing the Corporation to file a status report.

5. Learned counsel submits that thereafter on account of nationwide lockdown the appeal has not been taken up for hearing and today the Appellate Tribunal MCD is not functional.

6. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the owner of the lower ground floor has already filed an appeal and there is a status quo order with regard to his property by the Appellate Tribunal MCD.

7. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondent/Corporation. Learned counsel submits that property was inspected and deviation contrary to sanction plan was found from basement upto the third floor.

8. In view of the fact that petitioner has already filed an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal MCD and the appeal has not been taken up for consideration for the reasons stated afore-stated, this petition is disposed of with a direction that for a period of two weeks after the commencement of the functioning of the Appellate Tribunal MCD or till the time the appeal/stay application of the petitioner is taken up for consideration by the Appellate Tribunal MCD, whichever is earlier, no action of demolition shall be taken against the subject property.

9. The continuation of protection thereafter shall be subject to orders to be passed by the Appellate Tribunal MCD. It is clarified that the Appellate Tribunal MCD would be free to decide the appeal/stay application without being influenced by anything stated here in.

10. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

11. Copy of the Order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top