IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Savitri Dhamija - Appellant
Versus
North Delhi Municipal Corporation - Respondent
W.P.(C) 2557 of 2021
Decided On : 24-02-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's unaware of unauthorized construction upon purchase (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. contentions regarding unauthorized construction and compounding (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. direction for stay of demolition pending appeal (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (ORAL)
CM APPL.7539/2021(exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions
W.P.(C) 2557/2021 & CM APPL.7538/2021(stay)
1. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has already filed an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, MCD, however the appeal could not be taken up since there is no presiding officer.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has purchased the property in March, 2020 and was not aware of any unauthorized construction or any action being contemplated by the Corporation.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents/Corporation submits that action was taken after serving due notice to the owners/occupants of the building.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even though there may be some unauthorized construction, major portion of the construction may be compoundable/regularizable.
6. Learned counsel for the respondents/Corporation submits that since no application for compounding/regularization has been filed, property has not been inspected/examined from that point of view.
7. Learned counsel for the respondents/Corporation submits that there is some Civil Suit also pending with regard to unauthorized construction in the subject property.
8. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not a party to the suit and is not even aware of the said proceedings.
9. Since the petitioner has already approached the Appellate Tribunal, MCD and his appeal has not been taken up for consideration, this petition is disposed of with the direction that no demolition action shall be carried out in the property of the petitioner for a period of two weeks after the commencement of the functioning of the Appellate Tribunal, MCD or till the time appeal/stay application of the petitioner is taken up for consideration by the Appellate Tribunal MCD, whichever is earlier.
10. Continuation of protection thereafter shall be subject to orders to be passed by the Appellate Tribunal, MCD.
11. It is clarified that Appellate Tribunal, MCD shall consider the appeal/stay application without being influenced by anything stated in this order.
12. The petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms.
13. Copy of this order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email by the Court Master.
The court grants temporary protection against demolition for a property pending the resolution of a pending appeal regarding unauthorized construction, emphasizing the right to a fair hearing.
Interim protection is warranted to ensure fairness in proceedings when a demolition notice is contested and an appeal is pending.
The court upheld the principle of due process, granting a temporary stay on demolition orders pending resolution of the pending appeal before the Appellate Tribunal.
The Court directed the corporation to act against unauthorized construction based on the outcome of an ongoing appeal, emphasizing that appellate bodies must operate independently.
The court's decision emphasized the importance of allowing the respondents to avail of their remedy before the Appellate Tribunal-MCD in cases of unauthorized construction and demolition actions.
The court's decision was influenced by the need to provide the respondents with an opportunity to approach the appellate Tribunal-MCD and seek remedy in accordance with the law.
The court reiterated that unauthorized constructions can be demolished if they do not comply with building bye-laws, while allowing a deferral for an appeal process before the Appellate Tribunal.
The court has the discretion to grant temporary protection from demolition while imposing restrictions and making the continuation of protection subject to the orders of the relevant appellate author....
The court may grant interim protection against demolition orders pending appeals, with conditions on further construction activities to ensure adherence to existing regulations.
A stay on a demolition order can be granted pending appeal, emphasizing the need for functioning appellate mechanisms in administrative law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.