SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Savitri Dhamija - Appellant
Versus
North Delhi Municipal Corporation - Respondent
W.P.(C) 2557 of 2021
Decided On : 24-02-2021




The court grants temporary protection against demolition for a property pending the resolution of a pending appeal regarding unauthorized construction, emphasizing the right to a fair hearing.

Headnote:(A) Municipal Laws - Unauthorized Construction - Appeal to Appellate Tribunal - A petitioner who purchased property without knowledge of unauthorized construction is entitled to protection from demolition for two weeks after the Appellate Tribunal commences functioning. (Paras 3, 9, 10)

(B) Right to Fair Hearing - The Appellate Tribunal must consider the appeal without influence from prior statements in the High Court's order. (Paras 11, 12)

Facts of the case:
The appellant acquired property in March 2020 and claims ignorance of unauthorized construction, while the respondents assert that notice was served for the construction.

Findings of Court:
The petition is disposed of with a two-week protection period post-commencement of the Appellate Tribunal's functioning.

Issues: The main issues addressed include the petitioner's ignorance of unauthorized construction and the ongoing status of the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determines that the petitioner deserves time to have their appeal heard, highlighting the importance of fair process in administrative action regarding unauthorized construction.

Result: Petition disposed of as stated.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's unaware of unauthorized construction upon purchase (Para 2 , 3)
2. contentions regarding unauthorized construction and compounding (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. direction for stay of demolition pending appeal (Para 9 , 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (ORAL)

CM APPL.7539/2021(exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions

W.P.(C) 2557/2021 & CM APPL.7538/2021(stay)

1. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has already filed an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, MCD, however the appeal could not be taken up since there is no presiding officer.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has purchased the property in March, 2020 and was not aware of any unauthorized construction or any action being contemplated by the Corporation.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents/Corporation submits that action was taken after serving due notice to the owners/occupants of the building.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even though there may be some unauthorized construction, major portion of the construction may be compoundable/regularizable.

6. Learned counsel for the respondents/Corporation submits that since no application for compounding/regularization has been filed, property has not been inspected/examined from that point of view.

7. Learned counsel for the respondents/Corporation submits that there is some Civil Suit also pending with regard to unauthorized construction in the subject property.

8. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not a party to the suit and is not even aware of the said proceedings.

9. Since the petitioner has already approached the Appellate Tribunal, MCD and his appeal has not been taken up for consideration, this petition is disposed of with the direction that no demolition action shall be carried out in the property of the petitioner for a period of two weeks after the commencement of the functioning of the Appellate Tribunal, MCD or till the time appeal/stay application of the petitioner is taken up for consideration by the Appellate Tribunal MCD, whichever is earlier.

10. Continuation of protection thereafter shall be subject to orders to be passed by the Appellate Tribunal, MCD.

11. It is clarified that Appellate Tribunal, MCD shall consider the appeal/stay application without being influenced by anything stated in this order.

12. The petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms.

13. Copy of this order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email by the Court Master.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top