SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, REKHA PALLI
Allahabad Bank – Appellant
Versus
Shipra Pandey – Respondent


Table of Content
1. refund entitlement due to defects in title (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. appellant's denials of responsibility (Para 6 , 7)
3. bank's obligation to disclose defects in title (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. judicial reliance on precedent regarding disclosures (Para 11 , 18 , 19)
5. defective due diligence by respondent (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 17)
6. change in circumstances affects entitlement to a refund (Para 20 , 21 , 24)
7. claim of additional loss by respondent (Para 22 , 23)
8. conclusion on the impact of changed facts on the case (Para 26 , 27)
9. final decision to reverse previous ruling (Para 28)

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, J. (Oral)--This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment dated 24.07.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C.) No.3984/2018 preferred by the respondent No.1. By the impugned judgment, the learned Single Judge allowed the said writ petition and held that the respondent No.1/writ petitioner was entitled to refund of the sale amount of Rs.1,33,45,000/-. The learned Single Judge also directed that the respondent No.1 shall be entitled to refund of the expenditure incurred by her on e-stamp duty to the tune of Rs.5,30,800/- and a further amount o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top