JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, J. (Oral)--This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment dated 24.07.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C.) No.3984/2018 preferred by the respondent No.1. By the impugned judgment, the learned Single Judge allowed the said writ petition and held that the respondent No.1/writ petitioner was entitled to refund of the sale amount of Rs.1,33,45,000/-. The learned Single Judge also directed that the respondent No.1 shall be entitled to refund of the expenditure incurred by her on e-stamp duty to the tune of Rs.5,30,800/- and a further amount of Rs.1,33,700/- towards the registration charges in respect of the sale certificate/deed. Respondent No.1 had raised a certain bill to contend that she had incurred expenditure on renovation of the property in question and, in respect thereof, the appellant bank was directed to appoint a valuer from its panel to assess the value of the work carried out by the respondent No.1 for renovation of the property in question within eight weeks. The learned Single Judge directed that the amount valued shall be paid to the respondent No.1/writ petitioner within two weeks of such valuation. The aforesaid amoun