Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Suresh Singhal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ challenges order of central administrative tribunal. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioner's eligibility for promotion and delay in dpc. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. supreme court precedents cited for promotion eligibility. (Para 5) |
| 4. limitations on promotion post-retirement clarified. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. writ petition dismissed; order to be published. (Para 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral):--The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. Present writ has been filed challenging the Order dated 19th November, 2020 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in Original Application No. 1836 of 2020. Petitioner also seeks a direction to the Respondents to grant notional benefit of the promotion with consequential benefits of the Select List dated 26th February, 2020 prepared by the Union Public Service Commission or from the date of occurrence of the vacancy in the newly created post of Administrative Officer.
3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner contends that though the Petitioner was eligible for promotion, yet there was delay in convening the DPC which was convened only on 26th February 2020. He states that the Petitioner figured at Se
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
