Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Aegis Costumer Support Services Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Futuretimes Technology India Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for appointment of arbitrator (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. arbitration clause details (Para 3) |
| 3. non-opposition to arbitration (Para 5) |
| 4. appointment of arbitrator and terms (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. conclusion and order issued (Para 9) |
(Video-Conferencing)
C. Hari Shankar, J.
ARB.P. 144/2021
1. This is a petition under Sections 11(5) and 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("1996 Act" for short), for appointment of an arbitrator to arbitrate on the disputes between the parties.
2. The dispute, as set out in the petition, is contained in paras 1 to 24 thereof. As the respondent is not objecting to the appointment of an arbitrator to arbitrate on the disputes, this Court is not burdening the order with a recital of the facts.
3. The Arbitration Clause, in the agreement between the parties, reads thus:
"F. Governing Law & Arbitration
This LOE and all matters arising out of or related to this LOE shall be governed by the laws of India and courts at New Delhi shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any matter of dispute arising under this LOE.
All disputes arising in relation to or pertaining to or under this LOE or any part thereof shall be
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
