IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Bimal Kumar - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P. (C) 4780 of 2021, CM Appl. 14745 of 2021 and W.P. (C) 4784 of 2021, CM Appl. 14771 of 2021
Decided On : 13-05-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for pro rata pension based on similar cases. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondent's agreement subject to verification. (Para 4) |
| 3. instructions on pension payments and verification. (Para 5) |
| 4. order for timely payment and documentation. (Para 6 , 7) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)
CM APPL. 14745/2021 (Exemption) in W.P. (C) 4780/2021
CM APPL. 14771/2021 (Exemption) in W.P. (C) 4784/2021
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Applications stand disposed of.
W.P. (C) 4780/2021
W.P. (C) 4784/2021
1. These petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners state that the petitioners in these petition claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners in these petitions, on enquiry, state that the requisite No Objection Certificate (NOC) had been given.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly state that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, these petitions be disposed of.
5. Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of along with pending applications directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioners to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant them the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioners. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioners, for any reason, are not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioners, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioners shall be entitled to take further remedies there against. Needless to state that if any documents are asked for by the respondents, the same shall be furnished by the petitioners within a week.
6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.
7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.
The court affirmed the right to pro rata pension for eligible petitioners, ensuring compliance with equal treatment principles and due verification standards from prior judgments.
The court mandated verification of petitioners' entitlements to pro rata pension based on precedents, with interest on late payments.
The court affirmed the right to pro rata pension for similarly situated individuals, emphasizing the requirement of verification and timely payment of entitlements.
The court directed the payment of pro rata pension to the petitioner if found similarly situated as in prior decisions, establishing the principle of equality and fair treatment under law.
The court mandates that if the petitioner is similarly placed as in prior judgements, pro-rata pension must be granted, reinforcing the obligation for verification and timely communication regarding ....
The court establishes that pension claims must be assessed based on established precedents ensuring equity and mandated timelines for verification and payment.
Court mandates uniform treatment in pension claims based on prior judgments, ensuring timely payment and interest on delays.
Petitioners can receive pro rata pension if verified to be in similar circumstances as prior petitioners, with a provision for interest on delayed payments.
Equal treatment under Article 14 mandates that similarly situated individuals must be granted the same entitlements, with a requirement for justification on any discrepancies.
Equitable treatment mandates that similarly placed individuals receive the same pension benefits, with rights for verification and appeal preserved.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.