SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Bimal Kumar - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P. (C) 4780 of 2021, CM Appl. 14745 of 2021 and W.P. (C) 4784 of 2021, CM Appl. 14771 of 2021
Decided On : 13-05-2021




The court affirmed the right to pro rata pension for eligible petitioners, ensuring compliance with equal treatment principles and due verification standards from prior judgments.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21 - Service matters - The court granted relief to petitioners claiming pro rata pension based on previous judgments, recognizing their right to equal treatment under the law. (Paras 2-5)

(B) Right to Verification - The respondents retain the right to verify the petitioners' entitlement - If discrepancies arise, proper justification must be communicated in writing. (Paras 2-5)

(C) Interest on Arrears - Arrears not paid within prescribed time shall accrue interest at 7% per annum until payment. (Para 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners sought relief similar to that in prior cases and had obtained necessary NOCs.

Findings of Court:
The petitions were disposed of directing the respondents to verify claims and grant appropriate relief.

Issues: The main issues included the petitioners’ entitlement to pro rata pension based on prior judgments.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for equality and due verification before entitlement denial.

Result: Petitions disposed of in favor of the petitioners.

Table of Content
1. claim for pro rata pension based on similar cases. (Para 2 , 3)
2. respondent's agreement subject to verification. (Para 4)
3. instructions on pension payments and verification. (Para 5)
4. order for timely payment and documentation. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 14745/2021 (Exemption) in W.P. (C) 4780/2021

CM APPL. 14771/2021 (Exemption) in W.P. (C) 4784/2021

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Applications stand disposed of.

W.P. (C) 4780/2021

W.P. (C) 4784/2021

1. These petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners state that the petitioners in these petition claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners in these petitions, on enquiry, state that the requisite No Objection Certificate (NOC) had been given.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly state that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, these petitions be disposed of.

5. Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of along with pending applications directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioners to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant them the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioners. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioners, for any reason, are not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioners, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioners shall be entitled to take further remedies there against. Needless to state that if any documents are asked for by the respondents, the same shall be furnished by the petitioners within a week.

6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top