SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Sheetal Jain - Appellant
Versus
South Delhi Municipal Corporation - Respondent
W.P.(C) 2129 of 2021
Decided On : 25-02-2021




A demolition order is invalid if the municipal corporation fails to comply with the Appellate Tribunal's direction to reconsider a regularization application and identify unauthorized constructions.

Headnote:(A) Delhi Municipal Corporation Act - The Appellate Tribunal's directive regarding application for regularization - Demolition order quashed due to non-compliance by the Corporation with prior orders - The Corporation was directed to reconsider the regularization application after indicating unauthorized constructions and applicable charges. (Paras 8-10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged a demolition order issued on 12.01.2021 based on prior decisions from the Appellate Tribunal, which required the Municipal Corporation to decide the regularization application afresh and allowed no demolition until then.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the demolition order was illegal as the Corporation had failed to comply with previous orders, including indicating unauthorized constructions.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the Corporation could issue a demolition order without addressing the Tribunal's prior order regarding the regularization application.

Ratio Decidendi: The demolition order was quashed because the Corporation had not complied with the directions given by the Appellate Tribunal, thus rendering the demolition improper and unwarranted.

Result: The demolition order dated 12.01.2021 is quashed and the Corporation is ordered to comply with the directions given by the Tribunal regarding the regularization application.

Table of Content
1. non-compliance with prior tribunal order (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. demolition order quashed for procedural non-compliance (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. order for reconsideration and personal hearing (Para 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)

CM APPL.6222/2021 (exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 2129/2021 & CM APPL.6221/2021 (stay)

1. Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, learned Additional Standing counsel GNCTD has filed, over e-mail of the Court Master, the notification dated 23.02.2021, issued by the Government of NCT of Delhi, notifying the appointment of the Presiding Officer for the Appellate Tribunal, MCD. The same is taken on record.

2. Petitioner impugns the demolition order dated 12.01.2021.

3. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 submits that the regularisation application of the petitioner has already been dismissed by order dated 01.12.2010.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents were directed by the Appellate Tribunal, MCD by its order dated 06.02.2012 to decide the application for regularization afresh.

5. Learned counsel submits that admittedly Corporation has not passed any fresh order on the regularization application as directed by the Appellate Tribunal by its order dated 06.02.2012.

6. Apart from directing the respondents to decide the regularisation application afresh and not to demolish the property of the petitioner till then, order dated 06.02.2012 directs that petitioner shall demolish all non-compoundable/unauthorized construction in her flat, if any, as pointed out by the respondent and shall deposit the compounding charges as applicable in respect of the entire building.

7. It is not the case of the respondent that after the order dated 06.02.2012, the non-compoundable/unauthorized construction in her flat has been pointed to the petitioner.

8. Since the order of the Appellate Tribunal dated 06.02.2012 has not been complied with by the respondent corporation and a decision on the regularization application has not been taken afresh, the Corporation could not have passed the subject demolition order dated 12.01.2021.

9. This demolition order dated 12.01.2021 is accordingly quashed. Respondent/Corporation is now once again directed to comply with the direction of the Tribunal dated 06.02.2012 to re-consider the regularization application of the appellant.

10. Respondent shall first indicate to the petitioner the non-compoundable deviation/unauthorized construction in the flat as directed by Tribunal by its order dated 06.02.2012 and also communicate the compounding charges as applicable and thereafter on petitioner complying with the condition imposed by order dated 06.02.2012 of removing the non-compoundable deviations and payment of the regularization charges, the application of the petitioner for regularisation shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law.

11. It is directed that at the time of consideration of the application personal hearing shall also be granted to the petitioner.

12. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

13. Copy of the Order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top