SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Rocky Kane – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. quashing of fir due to amicable settlement. (Para 1 , 5 , 6)
2. court's role in resolving settled disputes. (Para 3 , 8)
3. legal basis for quashing the fir. (Para 9)
4. conclusion and disposal of the petition. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1. Vide the present petition, petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR No.150/2018, registered at police station Sagarpur, New Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom.

2. Notice issued.

3. Mr. G.M.Farooqui, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is present through video conference and she has been identified as the complainant of FIR in question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present through video conferencing.

4. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing.

5. The marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 was solemnized on 24.02.2016 and due to temporal differences, the marriage could not work and they started living separately since 03.02.2017. The dispute between the parties culminated into the FIR in question.

6

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top