SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Ashok Kr Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. fir quashing based on resolution of matrimonial dispute (Para 1 , 5)
2. court recognition of amicable resolution in judgment (Para 3 , 4 , 8)
3. parties affirm settlement and non-pursuance of fir (Para 6 , 7)
4. quashing of fir due to non-utility of proceedings (Para 9)
5. disposal of petition and status of order (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1. Vide the present petition, petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR No.136/2018, registered at police station South Rohini, New Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom.

2. Notice issued.

3. Mr.G.M.Farooqui, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is present through video conference and she has been identified as the complainant of FIR in question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present through video conferencing.

4. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

5. Petitioners are relatives of Arun Gupta, husband of respondent No.2/complainant, with whom respondent No.2 was having a matrimonial dispute at the time of registration of F

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top