SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Rohit Sharma – Appellant
Versus
A.M. Market Place Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to order for recalling proceedings. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments on service of summons. (Para 5 , 6)
3. details on serving summons and compliance. (Para 7 , 8 , 11 , 12)
4. court's reasoning on mandatory compliance with procedure. (Para 9 , 10 , 13 , 14 , 16)
5. final dismissal of the appeal. (Para 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral):--The appeal has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Present appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 14th January, 2020 passed by the learned Single Judge disposing of IA No.7667/2019 in CS (COMM) No. 1055/2018 filed under Order IX Rule 7 of CPC by appellant-defendant No.1 for recall of the order whereby the Trial Court decided to proceed ex parte against the appellant-defendant No.1. The appeal is accompanied by an application seeking condonation of delay of 263 days in refiling the appeal.

3. The learned Single Judge by the impugned order imposed cost of Rs.30,000/- for setting aside the order dated 19th December, 2018 to the extent that the Court had proceeded ex parte against the appellant-defendant No.1. However, the learned Single Judge held that appellant-defendant No.1's right to file written statemen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top