SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Aviraj Garg, Age 4 Years - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 10782 of 2020 with W.P.(C) 5315 of 2020 with W.P.(C) 322 of 2021 with W.P.(C) 1491 of 2021 with W.P.(C) 1511 of 2021 and W.P.(C) 1611 of 2021
Decided On : 02-03-2021




The court emphasized the necessity for timely medical treatment and therapies for rare diseases, directing proactive measures by government bodies to facilitate funding and expedite clinical trials.

Headnote:(A) Health and Family Welfare - Clinical trials and therapies for muscular dystrophy - The court recognized the importance of expedited treatment options for patients suffering from DMD and other rare diseases, emphasizing the necessity for the Union of India to explore crowdfunding avenues and expedite therapy development. A committee was constituted to assess treatment options and timelines. (Paras 4, 6-7)

(B) Administrative action - The court directed the Union of India to engage with pharmaceutical companies for proposals to facilitate the treatment of patients and to examine budget allocation for rare diseases. The court's emphasis was placed on the need for timely and effective solutions. (Paras 9)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a 4-year-old child suffering from muscular dystrophy, sought urgent and effective treatment, necessitating the court's intervention to explore funding and clinical trials in India for DMD therapies.

Findings of Court:
The court established a committee to recommend solutions for immediate treatment and the indigenization of therapy development, highlighting funding avenues for the treatment of rare diseases.

Issues: The main issues addressed were the availability of treatment options for rare diseases, the role of crowdfunding, and the acceleration of clinical trial processes.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that it is imperative for the Union of India to engage proactively with potential funding bodies and pharmaceutical companies while expediting the clinical trials underway for DMD therapies, ensuring timely access to necessary medical treatments for affected patients.

Result: A committee was formed to review and propose solutions for treatment options and funding by a specified deadline.

Table of Content
1. court's observations on ministry of health's engagement efforts. (Para 3 , 4)
2. clinical trials for dmd therapies underway in india. (Para 5)
3. committee established for comprehensive assessment of treatment options. (Para 6)
4. committee's report to cover treatment, indigenization, accelerated approval. (Para 7)
5. first committee meeting scheduled for treatment discussions. (Para 8)
6. affidavit required on health budget for treatment proposals. (Para 9)
7. next court date set for follow-up on actions taken. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

CM APPL. 4332/2021 (for exemption) in WP(C) 1511/2021

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.

WP(C) 10782/2020 & CM APPL. 33828/2020 (for interim direction)

WP(C) 5315/2020 & CM APPL. 19189/2020 (for interim direction)

WP(C) 322/2021 & CM APPL. 812/2021 (for interim direction)

WP(C) 1491/2021 & CM APPL. 4291/2021 (for interim direction)

WP(C) 1511/2021 & CM APPL. 4331/2021 (for interim direction)

WP(C) 1611/2021 & CM APPL. 4600/2021 (for interim direction)

3. The Court has perused the two affidavits filed by Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (hereinafter, "CDSCO") and the Union of India. The Court has also heard the submissions of Dr. Shastry from Dystrophy Annihilation Research Trust, Bangalore (hereinafter, "DART") and on behalf of the Institute of Child Health, Kolkata.

4. Firstly, this Court is of the opinion that there ought to have been greater effort by the Ministry of Health by engaging with M/s Sarepta Therapeutics, which was willing to provide a confidential proposal; by exploring more concrete options for crowdfunding etc. The clear stand of the Union of India appears to be that until the policy gets notified and the e- platform for crowdfunding is created, there can be no crowdfunding which can be explored. However, orally Dr. Pulkesh Singh for the Ministry of Health, Union of India, has mentioned that he has written to four organisations to arrange for funding for treatment of the said patients.

5. From the submissions made by Dr. Shastry from DART as also from the affidavit filed on behalf of CDSCO, it appears that clinical trials are already underway in India for drugs/therapies for the treatment of DMD. The details of the same are set out in the affidavit filed by CDSCO. The said affidavit and the submissions made today shows that there are various organisations and companies which are conducting clinical trials in respect of DMD therapies. The same include :-

    (i) M/s Medspace Clinical Research India Private Limited

    (ii) M/s Muscular Dystrophy Patients Welfare Society

    (iii) M/s Dystrophy Annihilation Research Trust

    (iv) Institute of Child Health, Kolkata

    (v) Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences (non sense mutation DMD)

    (vi) Child Trust Hospital, Chennai (non sense mutation DMD)

6. In view of the fact that there are various therapies for DMD which are already being researched upon in India and there are several children suffering from these diseases, the feasibility of accelerated approval processes ought to be examined. Further, the Union of India ought to explore the confidential proposal which is being put forward by M/s Sarepta Therapeutics for the purpose of making the therapy available for children who are suffering from DMD. In order to undertake a comprehensive assessment of the issues that have arisen and for recommending a time-line based solution, this Court constitutes the following Committee:

    (i) Chairperson - Dr. Renu Swarup, Secretary of Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India. (secy@dbt.nic.in)

    (ii) Dr. (Prof.) Madhulika Kabra, Division of Genetics, Department of Paediatrics, AIIMS (madhulikakabra@hotmail.com)

    (iii) Dr. IC Verma Director, Centre of Medical Genetics, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital (dr_icverma@yahoo.com) (iv) Dr. P. Ramesh Menon, Associate Professor, Department of

    Paediatrics, AIIMS (M: 8800997737) (rpmaiims@gma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top