Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Abdul Fahim – Appellant
Versus
State of Delhi NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of marriage and settlement (Para 3 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. court's reasoning for quashing fir (Para 8) |
| 3. quashing of fir ordered (Para 9 , 10) |
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
Crl. M.A. 1276/2021 (exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Applications are disposed of.
CRL.M.C.247/2021
3. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction for quashing of FIR No.169/2017, registered at Police Station Hauz Qazi, Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent no.2 present in Court through video conferencing and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 26.01.2015 as per Muslim rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between petitioners and respondent no.2, the dispute arose between them. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 entered into an amicable settlement before Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi vide Settlement dated 07.05.2019. As per the settlement, petitioner no.1 has alr
The court can quash an FIR when the parties involved have settled the dispute amicably and no further prosecution is desired, ensuring judicial resources are not wasted.
The court can quash an FIR when parties amicably settle their disputes and express a desire not to pursue the prosecution.
In cases of personal disputes resolved amicably, continuing prosecutions serve no purpose, allowing for the quashing of FIRs under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The High Court can quash an FIR when parties reach an amicable settlement and the complainant wishes to withdraw the prosecution, serving no useful purpose to continue legal proceedings.
Parties can amicably settle disputes, and such settlements justify quashing of FIRs, especially in cases stemming from personal issues.
The court may quash an FIR when the parties have reached an amicable settlement and there is no objection from the complainant regarding prosecution.
Amicable settlements can lead to the quashing of FIRs when both parties agree not to pursue prosecution, emphasizing judicial economy and resolution of disputes.
The court held that amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes justify quashing of FIRs, as continuing prosecution serves no purpose when parties wish to resolve their differences peacefully.
An FIR can be quashed if both parties have entered into a mutually agreed settlement and the complainant no longer wishes to pursue the case, demonstrating that prosecution serves no useful purpose.
The court ruled that mutual consent and amicable settlement between parties can justify quashing an FIR when prosecution serves no useful purpose.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
