SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Sunita Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
Yogesh Garg – Respondent


Table of Content
1. procedural history regarding property sealing. (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. challenge to re-sealing property after repairs. (Para 2 , 6)
3. observations on contempt proceedings. (Para 5 , 7)
4. right to challenge government actions. (Para 8)
5. procedural instructions and assurance. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT

The appeal has been heard by way of video conferencing.

C.M.No.9626/2021

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions

Application stands disposed of.

Cont.APP.(C) No.1/2021 & C.M.No.9625/2021

1. Present appeal has been filed challenging the common order dated 11th February, 2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in Cont. Case (C) 806/2020 (filed by the appellant herein) and Cont. Case 819/2020 (filed by the respondents herein), whereby the Court has directed that the appellant's property shall be re-sealed after carrying out repairs.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the observation made by the learned Single Judge that no repair work could be carried out without de-sealing was correct and favorable to the appellant. However, according to him, the direction to further re-seal the property after carrying out the repair work was not require

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top