Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
NAVIN CHAWLA
ICICI Bank – Appellant
Versus
Kanta Malhotra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to execution proceedings and maintainability. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. facts regarding fixed deposit litigation and court orders. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. decree entitling plaintiff to claim funds. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's prior observations on interest liability. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. finality of earlier decree and affirmed liability. (Para 9) |
| 6. dismissal of the petition without costs. (Para 10) |
| 7. possibility of amicable settlement suggested. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT
Navin Chawla, J. (Oral)--This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 12.03.2020 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-07, South-East District, in Execution No. 408/2019, proceeding further against the petitioner in the Execution Petition.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Execution Petition itself is not maintainable as it in fact prays for an amendment of the Decree.
3. To appreciate the submission made, certain facts would need to be highlighted.
4. The respondent no. 1 herein had filed suit, being CS No. 7398/2016, against the respondent no. 2 and the petitioner herein with respect to a Fixed Deposit opened by M/s. Grace Towers and Properties with
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
