SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Sumit Daga – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition aims to quash fir due to settlement. (Para 1 , 5 , 6)
2. court considers amicable resolution in decision. (Para 3 , 4 , 9)
3. agreement between parties to resolve dispute. (Para 7 , 8)
4. fir quashed due to resolved dispute. (Para 10)
5. petition allowed and concluded. (Para 11)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide this petition, petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR No.14/2017, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at police station Roop Nagar, Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom.

2. Notice issued.

3. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is present in the Court and she has been identified as the complainant of FIR in question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present in the Court.

4. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal.

5. The marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 was solemnized on 28.04.2009 and due to temporal differences, the marriage could not work and they started living separately since April, 2014. The dispute between the parties culminated into the FIR in que

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top