SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Deepak Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. dispute settled between parties. (Para 1 , 5 , 6)
2. consent and presence of complainant in court. (Para 3 , 4 , 7)
3. court quashes fir based on resolution. (Para 8 , 9)
4. final disposal of petition. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide present petition, quashing of FIR No.567/2019, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at police station Sagarpur, Delhi and all other proceedings arising there-from is sought by petitioners

2. Notice issued.

3. Mr. Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is present in the Court and she has been identified as the complainant of FIR in question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present in the Court.

4. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal.

5. The marriage of petitioner-husband and respondent No.2-wife was solemnized on 10.06.2017 and due to temporal differences, they started living separately since 16.11.2018. The dispute between the parties culminated into the FIR in question.

6. The present petition has been filed on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top