SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Chander Prakesh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. settlement between parties and case background. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. court's reasoning for quashing fir. (Para 9)
3. court's final decision on the matter. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction for quashing of FIR No.169/2018 dated 19.04.2018 registered at Police Station Neb Sarai and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

2. Notice issued.

3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for respondent no.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition is taken up for final disposal.

4. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 10.12.2013 as per Hindu rites and rituals. One male child was born out of the wedlock namely Ansh @ Daksh. Due to extreme incompatibilities between petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately.

5. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deed dated 28.08.2018 and settled all their disputes amicably.

6. The total settlement amount is Rs.16,00,000/- (Rupees Sixteen Lakhs only). It is submitted that the responde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top