SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Bhupender Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition seeks quashing of fir. (Para 1)
2. details of marriage and amicable settlement. (Para 4 , 5)
3. respondent does not wish to prosecute. (Para 6 , 7)
4. court's intent to quash fir. (Para 8)
5. final order allowing the petition. (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction for quashing of FIR No.276/2017, registered at Police Station Keshav Puram and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

2. Notice issued.

3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent no.2 present in person and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition is taken up for final disposal.

4. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 03.12.2012 as per Hindu rites and rituals. One child was born out of the wedlock namely master "Kartik". Due to extreme incompatibilities between petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 16.01.2016.

5. Petitioners and respondent no.2 entered into an amicable settlement vide Memorandum of Understanding-cum-Settlement Deed for mutual Divorce dated 30.10.2018 and settled all their disputes amicably.

6. Complainant/respondent No.2 is present in per

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top