SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Harveen Singh Giroti – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. request for quashing of fir (Para 1)
2. details of marriage and amicable settlement (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court's inclination to quash fir (Para 8)
4. final order to quash fir (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction for quashing of FIR No.217/2016 dated 08.03.2016 registered at Police Station Moti Nagar and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

2. Notice issued.

3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for respondent no.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition is taken up for final disposal.

4. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 04.12.2013 as per Hindu rites and rituals. One male child was born out of the wedlock namely Master Samarth Singh. Due to extreme incompatibilities between petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately.

5. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi vide settlement deed dated 23.04.2018 and settled all their disputes amicably.

6. The total settlement amount i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top