SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Ashok Kumar - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P. (C) 4802 of 2021
Decided On : 19-04-2021




Entitlement to pro rata pension is upheld, subject to verification of eligibility, with mandatory interest on delayed payments specified.

Headnote:(A) Writ Petition - Pro rata pension - The petitioner claims to be similarly positioned to previous petitioners seeking pro rata pension - The court directed the respondents to grant pension if found similarly placed - Arrears must be paid with interest if not disbursed on time. (Paras 2, 5, 6)

(B) Right to Claim - The court acknowledges provisions ensuring entitlement, subject to verification - Communicated reasons must be provided for any denial of pension entitlement. (Paras 4, 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar, sought the same relief as granted in connected cases concerning pro rata pension from the date of discharge until payment and for future payments. The requisite NOC was provided by the petitioner.

Findings of Court:
Within twelve weeks, if the petitioner is found similarly placed, the Indian Air Force must process and grant payment of arrears and continue pro rata pension. Interest on delayed payments calculated at 7% per annum applies post twelve weeks.

Issues: The main question was whether the petitioner is entitled to pro rata pension based on the judgments in connected cases.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the respondents must verify the petitioner’s claim within a stipulated timeframe and communicate any denial of entitlement with specific reasons to allow for potential further remedies.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions for payment of pro rata pension.

Table of Content
1. claim for pro rata pension on similar basis (Para 2 , 3)
2. verification and appeal rights preserved (Para 4)
3. directive for pension issuance based on verification (Para 5)
4. interest on delayed pension payment stipulated (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral):

CM APPL. 14827/2021

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P. (C) 4802/2021

1. Present petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner in this petition claims to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificate (NOC) had been given.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.

5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioner to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant him the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioner. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioner, for any reason, is not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioner, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioner shall be entitled to take further remedies there against. Needless to state that if any documents and information are asked for by the respondents, the same shall be furnished by the petitioner within a week.

6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top