SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Puneet Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background of the fir and settlement (Para 3 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. complainant's wish to not prosecute (Para 9)
3. court's decision to quash fir (Para 10 , 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

Crl. M.A. 4918/2021 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C.963/2021

3. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction for quashing of FIR No.538/2016 registered at Police Station Sultanpuri, Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

4. Notice issued.

5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for respondent no.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 07.12.2014. Thereafter, disputes arose between the parties and subsequently, the present FIR was lodged.

7. Petitioners and respondent no.2 entered into an amicable settlement before the Counselling Cell, Family Courts, Dwarka, Delhi vide settlement dated 06.03.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.

8. The total settlement amount is Rs.2,25,000/-. It is submitted that the respondent no. 2 has already received an amount o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top