SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Rajkumar – Appellant
Versus
National Human Rights Commission – Respondent


JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J.

1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:

    "In view of the submissions made above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue appropriate writ/direction to:

    a) Call for the records of the case and quash and set aside the impugned order dated 05.01.2021 at (Annexure P-1).

    b) Direct the respondent to continue the petitioner on deputation till the expiry of this remaining tenure as extended by the Competent Authority with all consequential benefits; and

    c) Any order or further relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit, just and proper in the peculiar circumstances of the case in the interest of justice may also please be awarded.

2. The facts as noted from the writ petition and so highlighted by Mr. V.K. Garg, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner are that the petitioner is a Judicial Officer of Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service (District & Sessions Judge). On April 3, 2018, the respondent, National Human Rights Commission (`NHRC', for short), issued an advertisement inviting the applications for appointment to the post of Presenting Officer (`PO', for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top