Rajkumar vs National Human Rights Commission

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Rajkumar – Appellant
Versus
National Human Rights Commission – Respondent

Table of Content
1. petitioner's prayers for relief. (Para 1)
2. facts regarding appointment and extension. (Para 2 , 3)
3. petitioner's arguments against repatriation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
4. respondent's defense and justification. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. court's observations on legality of repatriation. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
6. court's authority on duration of deputation. (Para 21)

JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J.

1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:

"In view of the submissions made above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue appropriate writ/direction to:

a) Call for the records of the case and quash and set aside the impugned order dated 05.01.2021 at (Annexure P-1).

b) Direct the respondent to continue the petitioner on deputation till the expiry of this remaining tenure as extended by the Competent Authority with all consequential benefits; and

c) Any order or further relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit, just and proper in the peculiar circumstances of the case in the interest of justice may also please be awarded.

2. The facts as noted from the writ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTV.KAMESWAR RAORajkumar – AppellantVersusNational Human Rights Commission – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Rajkumar – Appellant
Versus
National Human Rights Commission – Respondent