Seniority in academic appointments must be determined by continuous service length under applicable statutes, rather than solely on the date of eligibility for promotion.

JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 2756/2021 in W.P.(C) 1008/2021 (for exemption)

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

CM APPL. 7946/2021 (for early hearing) in W.P.(C) 13219/2018

CM APPL. 7433/2021 (for early hearing) in W.P.(C) 1008/2021

For the reasons stated in the applications and the counsel for the respondent/University having no objection on the applications being allowed, the same are allowed and the writ petitions are taken up for hearing. Applications are disposed of.

W.P.(C) 13219/2018

W.P.(C) 1008/2021

1. As these two petitions have been filed by the same petitioner and the issues raised in these petitions are inter-connected, with the consent of the counsels for the parties, they have been finally heard and are being disposed of by this common Judgment.

2. The writ petition being W.P.(C) 13219/2018 has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction against the respondent University to grant seniority in accordance with the provisions of the Delhi University Act, 1922, Statutes made thereunder and the UGC Regulations dated June 30, 2010. Whereas W.P.(C) 1008/2021 has been filed by the petitioner challenging the notification dated December 17, 2020, whereby the respondent No.2, namely Prof. Surender Kumar, has been appointed as the Head of the Department (`HOD', for short) of the Department of Economics, for a term of three years.

3. The common facts in both the writ petitions, as urged by Mr. Shikhar Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner, are that the petitioner started his career in the respondent University in the year 1997, when he was appointed as a Reader, which post w.e.f October 1, 2006 was re- designated as Associate Professor. Thereafter, he was promoted as Professor w.e.f. October 16, 2003 under the Career Advancement Scheme (`CAS', for short), 1998 vide Office Order dated July 1, 2015. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner has been given all financial benefits as Professor w.e.f. October 16, 2003.

4. The submission of Mr. Khare with regard to the seniority is that the petitioner having been promoted as Professor w.e.f. October 16, 2003, his seniority must relate back to the said date and based on the said seniority, the petitioner is entitled to be appointed as HOD, Department of Economics. In this regard, he submits that the respondent University has prepared two seniority lists wherein he has been placed at the bottom, i.e., as the junior most and in fact junior to even those Professors who had not even joined the respondent University as a Reader when the petitioner was serving as one. Mr. Khare submits that the petitioner has made various representations and had also met Pro-Vice-Chancellor with regard to his grievances both on seniority and denial of the headship of the Department of Economics. Unfortunately, the request of the petitioner for grant of both has not been acceded to. According to Mr. Khare, the respondent University has failed to appreciate the mandate of the UGC Regulations that the seniority of a promotee has to be computed from the date of eligibility and not from the date of joining. The petitioner having been promoted from October 16, 2003, i.e., the date of eligibility, his seniority must relate back to the said date. Even under Statute 37 and Ordinance XI, the petitioner is entitled to the seniority w.e.f. October 16, 2003 as, the petitioner has been in con