Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
NAVIN CHAWLA
Sudhir Kumar @ S. Baliyan – Appellant
Versus
Vinay Kumar G.B. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to trial court's order on document submission. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on the nature of documents and prejudices. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. delay and laches in filing the petition. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. plaintiff's obligation to disclose documents. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. requirements for late document submissions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. test for 'reasonable cause' in document non-disclosure. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 7. inadequacy of plaintiff's explanations. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. rejection of parity argument for document submission. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 9. distinction of cited cases from the present case. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 10. final dismissal of the petitioner’s request. (Para 28) |
JUDGMENT
Navin Chawla, J. This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 13.11.2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-10 (Central) in Suit, being TM No.123 of 2019, titled Sudhir Kumar @ S. Baliyan v. Vinay Kumar G B & Ors., dismissing the application filed by the petitioner under Order VII Rule 14(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as `the Code') seeking leave of the learned Trial Court to place additional documents on
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
