Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Entertainment Network (India) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
HT Media Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for additional documents in the suit. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendant's arguments for filing additional documents. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. court's analysis on the admissibility of documents. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 4. partial allowance of the application to file additional documents. (Para 32) |
| 5. next steps in the proceedings. (Para 33) |
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J.
I.A. 1882/2020 (Under Order XI Rule 7(c) CPC as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 151 CPC, by Defendant)
1. Present application has been preferred on behalf of the Defendant under Order XI Rule 7(c) CPC as amended by the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the `Act') read with Section 151 CPC, seeking permission to bring additional documents on record and lead evidence with respect to these documents.
2. Plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant and all others acting on its behalf using any trademark that is identical or dec
The court ruled that timely disclosure of evidence is critical under the Commercial Courts Act, and failure to show reasonable cause for delays can result in exclusion of documents at trial.
The court emphasized the strict adherence to document filing rules in commercial disputes, denying late submission of documents without establishing reasonable cause for prior non-disclosure.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the plaintiff to disclose all documents in its power, possession, control or custody, pertaining to the Suit, along with the pl....
The court confirmed that documents arising after the submission of written statement may be included without showing reasonable cause for non-disclosure, emphasizing the importance of procedural just....
Parties in commercial disputes must timely disclose documents; late submissions require a compelling justification to avoid prejudicing the opposing party.
Order XI Rule 1(7) of CPC, as applicable to commercial disputes, casts an obligation on defendant to file all documents in its power, possession, control or custody.
(1) After Order XI Rule 1 has been amended with respect to suits before commercial courts and a specific provision/procedure has been prescribed with respect to suits before commercial division and b....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that 'reasonable cause' for not filing additional documents cannot extend to negligence in filing of documents before the court, and that the docum....
The judgment established the principle that in a commercial suit, defendants must meticulously comply with the requirements for filing documents, and leave to file new documents after the written sta....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
