SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Kailash Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. grounds for quashing fir based on settlement (Para 1 , 4 , 5)
2. procedural status of the hearing (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's observation on resolution of dispute (Para 6 , 7)
4. quashing of fir based on amicable resolution (Para 8)
5. final order on petition and application (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1. By this petition, petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR No.95/2018, registered at police station Nihal Vihar, Delhi.

2. Mr. G.M.Farooqui, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is present through video conferencing and she has been identified as the complainant of FIR in question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present through video conferencing.

3. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing.

4. The marriage between petitioner No.1/husband and respondent No.2/wife was solemnized on 11.12.2014 as per Hindu Rites but due to temperamental differences, the marriage could not work and they started living separately since 2016. The matrimonial dispute between the parties culminated into

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top