SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Tantia Construction Limited – Appellant
Versus
Ircon International Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT (Oral)

(Video-Conferencing)

1. This petition, under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("the 1996 Act"), is directed against a supplementary award dated 20th August, 2020, passed by the learned arbitrator. By the supplementary award, the amounts awarded in favour of the petitioner in the original award dated 23rd January, 2020, against Claims No. 6 and 12, were reduced. The amount of Rs.1,90,86,595/-, awarded in respect of claim no. 6, was reduced to Rs.97,85,184/- and the amount of Rs.58,08,475/-, awarded in respect of claim no. 12, was reduced to Rs.54,01,882/-. Side by side, the learned arbitrator also modified the reasons for awarding the aforesaid amounts. The changes effected by the impugned supplementary award stand captured, in the impugned award itself, in a tabular form, thus:

"Claim no. 6 Claim for illegal encashment of performance bank guaranteeAmount claimed (Rs.)Amount awarded in Original award (Rs.)Award modified (Rs.)
1,90,86,5951,90,86,59597,85,184
Original reasons of awardModified reasons of award
As deliberated in above paras, the termination of the contract was wrongful, illegal and arbitrary due to the occurrence of earthquake in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top