SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Tarc Projects Limited - Appellant
Versus
North Delhi Municipal Corporation - Respondent
W.P.(C) 6618 of 2021 & CM Appln. 20806-07 of 2021
Decided On : 16-07-2021




The necessity of a fair hearing is paramount, particularly when external circumstances, like a nationwide lockdown, impede a party's compliance with procedural requirements.

Headnote:(A) Municipal Corporation Act - Local Body Taxation - Assessment Order - Petitioner challenges assessment order dated 28.05.2021 determining annual value at Rs.11,38,17,600/- and warrant of distress attaching bank account due to property tax arrears - Petitioner could not appear before assessment authority due to nationwide lockdown - Respondent agreed to provide fresh hearing for reassessment - Assessment order set aside, matter remitted for fresh assessment. (Paras 2, 3, 7, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner contests an assessment order and warrant of distress issued by the respondent, leading to bank account attachment. Petitioner claims inability to appear for a scheduled hearing due to lockdown and has issued a post-dated cheque towards tax arrears.

Findings of Court:
The court set aside the previously contested assessment order and mandated a fresh hearing be conducted by the respondent for reassessment of property tax.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the legality of the assessment order and the consequences of the nationwide lockdown on the ability to appear before the authority.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity of fair hearing, especially in light of the pandemic-induced restrictions affecting the petitioner's ability to comply with legal processes.

Result: Assessment order set aside, matter remitted for fresh assessment.

Table of Content
1. challenge to assessment order. (Para 2)
2. arguments regarding assessment and payment. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. respondent's willingness for reassessment. (Para 6 , 7)
4. setting aside the original assessment order. (Para 8 , 9)
5. final order and directions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (ORAL)--The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner impugns assessment order dated 28.05.2021 and warrant of distress dated 24.06.2021, issued by the respondent attaching the bank account of the petitioner with HDFC Bank.

3. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that by the impugned assessment order, the annual value has been determined at Rs.11,38,17,600/- pursuant to a show cause notice dated 07.04.2021.

4. Learned senior counsel submits that the petitioner could not appear pursuant to the show cause notice on 30.04.2021 for a hearing and file the requisite documents in view of the nationwide lockdown imposed.

5. Learned senior counsel further submits that without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, petitioner has already issued a post dated cheque of Rs. 87,91,253/- towards payment of the arrears of property tax. He, however, under instructions submits that by 31.07.2021, a sum of Rs.87,91,253/- shall be paid to the respondent by way of a demand draft/deposited with the respondent.

6. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for respondent.

7. Learned counsel for respondent submits that that without admitting the averments made in the petition, respondents are willing to give a fresh hearing to the petitioner pursuant to the notice dated 07.04.2021 and pass a fresh assessment order. Learned counsel submits that that an opportunity of hearing shall be granted to the petitioner. She further submits that the deposit of Rs.87,91,253/- would be without prejudice to the stand of the Corporation that since the petitioner has not paid the amount within time, the petitioner is also liable to pay penalty and interest on the delayed payment.

8. In view of the above, assessment order dated 28.05.2021 is set aside and the matter is remitted to the assessing authority for passing a fresh assessment order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

9. Further, on petitioner depositing the said amount of Rs.87,91,253/-, the warrant of distress would stand quashed and the attachment of the bank account of the petitioner with the HDFC Bank shall stand lifted.

10. Petitioner is directed to appear before the assessing authority on 29.07.2021 at 11 A.M. The date has been fixed with the consent of the parties.

11. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

12. Copy of the Order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top