SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Amrapali Steels Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
North Delhi Municipal Corporation – Respondent


Table of Content
1. assessment of property tax and demand details. (Para 2)
2. arguments regarding assessment process and personal hearing. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court directions for reassessment and procedures. (Para 7)
4. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner impugns assessment order dated 10.06.2021 whereby the respondent-Corporation has assessed the property of the petitioner retrospectively with effect from 01.04.2004 and demanded an amount of Rs.21,60,425/- as arrears of property tax including interest and penalty as on 08.06.2021.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not given a personal hearing. He submits that the respondent-Corporation has not given credit for the amounts already deposited. He submits that approximately a sum of Rs.3 lakhs have been paid which has not been accounted for by the Corporation.

4. He submits that the property was measured in the absence of the petitioner and assessment order has been passed retrospectively in respect of portions of the property which were not even constructed in the year 2004 and were

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top