IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Amrapali Steels Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
North Delhi Municipal Corporation - Respondent
W.P.(C) 7059 of 2021 & CM Appln. 22293 of 2021
Decided On : 29-07-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. assessment of property tax and demand details. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding assessment process and personal hearing. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court directions for reassessment and procedures. (Para 7) |
| 4. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.
2. Petitioner impugns assessment order dated 10.06.2021 whereby the respondent-Corporation has assessed the property of the petitioner retrospectively with effect from 01.04.2004 and demanded an amount of Rs.21,60,425/- as arrears of property tax including interest and penalty as on 08.06.2021.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not given a personal hearing. He submits that the respondent-Corporation has not given credit for the amounts already deposited. He submits that approximately a sum of Rs.3 lakhs have been paid which has not been accounted for by the Corporation.
4. He submits that the property was measured in the absence of the petitioner and assessment order has been passed retrospectively in respect of portions of the property which were not even constructed in the year 2004 and were constructed in the year 2013.
5. This is disputed by learned counsel for the respondent. Learned counsel submits that warrants of distress has been issued to the ICICI Bank, Model Town to attach the bank account of the petitioner to an extent of Rs.18,86,291/- and as per his instructions the said amount has been attached by the bank.
6. He, however, submits that without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, respondent-Corporation is willing to give a fresh hearing to the petitioner. He prays that the amount attached by the bank be directed to be remitted to the Corporation.
7. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and the above submissions, this petition is disposed of with the following directions:
i) The impugned assessment order dated 10.06.2021 is set aside. The matter is remitted to the Deputy Assessor & Collector for fresh assessment.
ii) Petitioner shall appear before the Deputy Assessor & Collector on 09.08.2021 at 11.00 a.m. along with documents in support of his assessment.
iii) Petitioner would be at liberty to file further objections, if any on the said date.
iv) The officers of the Corporation shall measure the property in the presence of the petitioner and thereafter, after giving an opportunity of a personal hearing, pass fresh assessment order.
v) ICICI Bank, Model Town is directed to remit a sum of Rs.9,50,000/- to the respondent Corporation out of the attached amount and the remaining attached amount shall be retained by the bank which shall be subject to the fresh assessment order to be passed by the respondent Corporation.
vi) On remittance of the said amount of Rs.9,50,000/- and retention of the remaining attached amount, attachment on the bank account of the petitioner shall be lifted.
vii) The Deputy Assessor & Collector shall pass a fresh assessment order within a period of two months from 09.08.2021.
8. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.
9. Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email by the Court Master.
Procedural fairness requires that property tax assessments include a personal hearing and account for prior payments made by the taxpayer.
Property Tax - Assessment Order set aside - Matter is remitted to Deputy Assessor & Collector for fresh assessment - On remittance of said amount and retention of remaining attached amount, attachmen....
The necessity of a fair hearing is paramount, particularly when external circumstances, like a nationwide lockdown, impede a party's compliance with procedural requirements.
The court emphasized the need for a fair assessment process and proper adherence to legal procedures when imposing retrospective tax liabilities.
The assessing authority must consider submitted objections before amending the assessment list, ensuring compliance with statutory obligations and providing fair opportunity for hearing.
Taxation - Assessment - Impugned order is not sustainable as same has been passed contrary to sub-section (2) of Section 72.
Quash of Assessment – Demand notice - Order records to the contrary that no response has been received from the recorded owner with regard to the said notice.
Court reinforces the need for proper assessment procedures in property tax matters, emphasizing compliance with prior judicial directives and the provision of fair hearing.
Property tax – Assessment - Petitioner/authorized representative shall appear before Assistant Assessor and Collector, ASC Department and produce requisite documents in support of assessment.
Point of law : On petitioner furnishing the proof of deposit of the said amount with the respondent, the Manager, Central Bank of India shall lift attachment of the said account.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.