Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Pitabasa Panigrahi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners claim pro rata pension relief. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents recognize right to appeal. (Para 4) |
| 3. respondents directed to grant pension relief conditionally. (Para 5) |
| 4. interest on delayed pension payment. (Para 6) |
| 5. order to be communicated and uploaded. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral):
CM APPL. 9498/2021
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
WP (C) No. 3129/2021
1. This petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners in this petition claim to be similarly placed to the petitioner in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners in this petition, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificate (NOC) had been given.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to t
Court mandates uniform treatment in pension claims based on prior judgments, ensuring timely payment and interest on delays.
Entitlement to pro rata pension is extended to similarly situated individuals, with mandatory verification of eligibility prior to payment and provision of interest on delayed payments.
The court mandates that if the petitioner is similarly placed as in prior judgements, pro-rata pension must be granted, reinforcing the obligation for verification and timely communication regarding ....
The court affirmed the right to pro rata pension for eligible petitioners, ensuring compliance with equal treatment principles and due verification standards from prior judgments.
The court affirmed the right to pro rata pension for similarly situated individuals, emphasizing the requirement of verification and timely payment of entitlements.
The court establishes that pension claims must be assessed based on established precedents ensuring equity and mandated timelines for verification and payment.
The court upheld that petitioners similarly placed to prior judgments are entitled to pro rata pension benefits, mandating timely compliance by the respondents with specified conditions.
The court directed the payment of pro rata pension to the petitioner if found similarly situated as in prior decisions, establishing the principle of equality and fair treatment under law.
Entitlement to pro rata pension established upon verification of petitioners' status against precedent cases, with stipulated interest on delayed payments.
An individual claiming entitlement to pro rata pension must be evaluated based on the same criteria as established in analogous previous cases, with timely payment mandated.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
