IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, Amit Bansal, JJ.
Aman Yadav - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 4557 of 2021 and W.P.(C) 4662 of 2021
Decided On : 21-05-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. delay in petition leads to acquiescence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. petitioner's delay is justified by pursuit in subsequent years. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. medical unfitness established through standards. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. unfitness due to multiple medical conditions. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. both petitions dismissed for lack of merit. (Para 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.
(A) These petitions, though by different petitioners but filed through the same advocate, have some similarity in facts and are being listed together and have today also been heard together and are disposed of by this common judgment. However for the sake of clarity of facts, first the narrative of W.P.(C) 4557/2021 is given herein below and thereafter under W.P.(C) 4662/2021, only the facts which are different therein are highlighted.
W.P.(C) 4557/2021
1. The petitioner, being a candidate for recruitment as an Airman in the respondents Indian Air Force, during the recruitment drive of the year 2019, has filed this petition impugning the decision of the Appeal Medical Board finding the petitioner unfit for serving in the respondents Indian Air Force.
2. This petition, impugning the finding dated 22nd August, 2019, of the Appeal Medical Board, is dated 8th April, 2021 and came up first before this Court on 15th April, 2021, i.e. after nearly twenty months of the date when the Appeal Medical Board found the petitioner unfit. We have thus, at the outset enquired from the counsel for the petitioner, why the petition, claiming the relief of recruitment, should not be dismissed as barred by delay laches and acquiescence.
3. The counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner, after having been found medically unfit by the Appeal Medical Board on 22nd August, 2019, in or about March, 2020 filed a writ petition in this Court but which did not get listed and thus this petition was again filed and got listed.
4. The aforesaid is no explanation for the long delay especially considering that the matter relates to recruitment of the year 2019 and which recruitment, by now would have been long over. The petitioner, when had been declared medically unfit on 22nd August, 2019, if really desirous of joining the respondents Indian Air Force and if dissatisfied with the finding of the Appeal Medical Board, should have taken steps immediately. The first petition also, is stated to have been filed after seven months therefrom, in March, 2020, and which was also not pursued. Though on account of the prevalent pandemic, the functioning of this Court was restricted with effect from mid-March 2020, but urgent matters were being taken up. The petitioner, if felt any urgency, could have got the petition listed and the fact that the petitioner waited for one year, speaks volumes of the laxity on the part of the petitioner.
5. The counsel for the petitioner then states that the petitioner is still of eligible age.
6. We have enquired from the counsel for the petitioner, that if the petitioner as per the age is still eligible, whether the petitioner participated in the recruitment drive of the years 2020 and 2021.
7. The counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner participated in the said drives, but could not qualify and did not reach the stage of Medical Examination even.
8. That explains the delay on the part of the petitioner. The petitioner, though decided to take a chance of recruitment in the following years but after being unsuccessful therein, has decided to challenge the finding of the Appeal Medical Board in the recruitment drive of the year 2019.
9. Be that as it may, we have examined the merits also. The Appeal Medical Board found the petitioner medically unfit on account of "Portwine Stain (Vascular Nevus)".
10. The counsel for the respondents Indian Air Force, pursuant to the directions in the earlier order, has produced before us an extract of the Man
Point of law: Recruitment - Declaration as unfit - petitioner unfit for the reason of “Multiple Keloids” - Rightly declared as unfit.
Medical Board decisions on fitness for military service are final, and significant delays in challenging such decisions can result in the dismissal of petitions for relief.
The unhealed wound at the time of the medical examination rightfully disqualified the petitioner from selection.
Candidates must act diligently and promptly when disputing recruitment disqualifications, as delays can negate their claims even if circumstances change subsequently.
The Appeal Medical Board's determination of medical unfitness prevails unless credible evidence of bias is presented; surgical corrections post-assessment do not automatically warrant re-evaluation.
The importance of recruiting physically fit candidates for the Armed Forces and the preference of the Force's medical specialists' opinion over civilian doctors in such matters.
The court emphasized the importance of medical fitness for enrollment in the Indian Air Force and upheld the decision of the Appeal Medical Board based on the specialist's confirmation of the origina....
The opinion of the medical experts of the appointing authority shall prevail, and the parameters of fitness and required standards for appointment in the Indian Navy cannot be judicially reviewed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.