Maya Devi Private ITI vs Directorate General of Training

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Maya Devi Private ITI – Appellant
Versus
Directorate General of Training – Respondent

Table of Content
1. facts about itis and affiliation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding minimum trade requirement. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. analysis of 2018 affiliation norms. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. interpretation of norms regarding existing itis. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. dgt's shifting position and its implications. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
6. judgment from himachal pradesh and its relevance. (Para 18 , 19)
7. conclusion and orders of the court. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT

Prateek Jalan, J. (Oral)

The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.

1. The petitioners in these two cases are industrial training institutes ("ITIs"), affiliated to the Directorate General of Training [hereinafter, "DGT"]. They assail decisions of the DGT by which they have been refused affiliation in respect of additional units, i.e. to increase their intake of trainees, for the trades in which they are affiliated. As the writ petitions concern a substantially similar issue, they are taken up for hearing and disposal together.

Facts

2. The relevant facts in W.P.(C) 94/2021 are as follows:

(a) The petitioner, Maya Devi Private ITI, applied for affiliation to the DGT in the year 2008. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTPRATEEK JALANMaya Devi Private ITI – AppellantVersusDirectorate General of Training – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Maya Devi Private ITI – Appellant
Versus
Directorate General of Training – Respondent