SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Janta Associates and Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Indian Oil Foundation – Respondent


Table of Content
1. exemption applications in procedural context. (Para 1 , 2)
2. scope of section 9 application under arbitration act. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court’s power to grant final relief under admitted liability. (Para 5 , 6)
4. conditions for granting relief and contract compliance. (Para 7 , 8)
5. appellant's failure to prove entitlement to relief. (Para 9 , 10 , 12)
6. restrictions on expanding application scope in appeal. (Para 11)

ORDER

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

CM No.16979/2021 (for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions and as per extant rules.

2. The application is disposed of.

FAO(OS) (COMM) 76/2021 & CM No.16978/2021 (for stay)

3. This appeal, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 13(1A) of the COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT , 2015, impugns the order dated 11th May, 2021 of the Commercial Division, of dismissal of OMP(I)(COMM) No.74/2020 preferred by the appellant.

4. The Commercial Division has dismissed the Section 9 application of the appellant, holding that (i) the relief claimed therein of directing the respondents to pay to the appellant Rs.1,89,91,737/-, was in the nature of a final relief which could not be granted in exer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top