DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Satish Chandra Verma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. In pursuance to the last order, both the parties have filed their written submissions.
3. In the respondents' written submissions, it is stated that the Ministry is in the process of sending its enquiry report to the UPSC for its advice after taking approval from the Disciplinary Authority and thereafter, the said advice shall be sent to the petitioner to file his representation. It is further stated that after receipt of the representation of the petitioner, the same shall be placed before the Disciplinary Authority, who will take its decision considering the enquiry report, advice of UPSC and representation of the petitioner.
4. From the aforesaid, it is apparent that no final decision can be taken by the Disciplinary Authority for atleast three months.
5. Since both the parties have filed their short written submissions and the matters have already been directed to be listed by the Central Administrative Tribunal for hearing and disposal in the first week of July, 2021, this Court directs the Tribunal to take up the matters for hearing and disposal on 06th July, 2021 by virtue of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.