IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Rajiv Shakdher, Talwant Singh, JJ.
Lokesh Constructions P. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax - Respondent
W.P.(C) 5491 of 2021
Decided On : 27-05-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to assessment order without notice (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. importance of show cause notice in assessments (Para 8 , 12) |
| 3. set aside order with liberty to reassess (Para 9 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. details of income declaration and additions made (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. disposal of writ petition (Para 18) |
JUDGMENT
[Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19]
Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)
CM APPL. 17023/2021
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
CM APPL. 17024/2021
2. The prayer made in the captioned application is to grant exemption from filing requisite court-fee and sworn/notarised/affirmed affidavit. The captioned application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to place on record the duly sworn/notarised/affirmed affidavit and to deposit the requisite court-fee, within three days of the resumption of the normal and usual work pattern by this court.
W.P.(C) 5491/2021 and CM APPL. 17022/2021 [Application filed on behalf of petitioner, under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, seeking stay on the operation of order passed by respondent, dated 07.04.2021.]
3. Via this writ petition, challenge has been laid to the assessment order dated 07.04.2021, passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 143(3A) & 143(3B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, `the Act'), as also the consequential notice of demand issued under Section 156 of the Act, and notice for initiation of penalty proceedings issued under Section 274 read with Section 270A of the Act.
4. To be noted, the impugned assessment order concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2018-2019.
5. The principal grievance of the petitioner is that, the impugned assessment order was passed without issuance of a show cause notice-cum-draft-assessment order.
6. Issue notice.
7. Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent/revenue.
7.1. Ms. Malhotra says that, in view of the directions that we propose to pass, she does not wish to file a reply and will argue the matter based on the record, presently, available with the Court.
7.2. Accordingly, with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal.
8. At the outset, Ms. Malhotra, fairly, draws our attention to the judgement passed by this Court, today, in W.P. (C) 5552/2021 [listed on our board today as Item No. 28], the ratio of which, according to her, will apply, to this matter, as well.
9. As indicated above, the respondent/revenue passed the impugned assessment order, without issuance of a show cause notice-cum-draft assessment order.
10. It is required to be noted that initially, the petitioner had declared its income as Rs.87,55,390/-; which was revised to Rs.73,59,500/-.
11. Via the impugned assessment order dated 07.04.2021, an addition of Rs.13,95,890/-, has been made to the declared income of the petitioner.
12. To our minds, since there was a variation in the declared income, the respondent was required to issue a show cause notice-cum-draft assessment order, in consonance with the provisions of Section 144B of the Act and the Faceless Assessment Scheme, 2019. [See: Judgement dated 27.05.2021, passed in W.P. (C) No. 5552/2021, titled YCD Industries vs. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi]
13. Accordingly, the impugned assessment order, and the consequential notices issued, i.e., notice of demand issued under Section 156 of the Act, and notice for initiation of penalty proceedings issued under Section 274 read with Section 270A of the Act, are set aside.
14. Liberty is, however, given to the respondent/revenue to pass a fresh assessment order, albeit, as per law.
15. The respondent/revenue will grant a personal hearing to the authorised representative of the petitioner.
16. For this purpose, the respondent/revenue will convene a hearing via the video-conferencing mechanism.
17. The respondent/revenue will also indicate the date and time of the hearing, w
Assessment orders must adhere strictly to procedural requirements, including show cause notices, to ensure fairness in the income assessment process.
The impugned assessment order and consequential notices were set aside as they were passed without issuance of a show cause notice-cum-draft assessment order, as required by Section 144B of the Act a....
Procedural safeguards mandated under the Income Tax Act must be adhered to, including issuing a show cause notice to the assessee before passing an assessment order.
The court found a breach of natural justice due to the respondent's failure to consider the petitioner's request for adjournment, resulting in the setting aside of the assessment order.
The assessment order was set aside due to breach of natural justice, specifically failure to consider the petitioner's objections filed before the order was made.
The assessing officer must consider any requests for accommodation before issuing assessment orders, ensuring procedural fairness in tax assessments.
The failure to grant a personal hearing in assessment proceedings violates principles of natural justice, invalidating the assessment order.
Point of Law – Assessment order – Request for accommodation - once a request for accommodation was made, it was incumbent upon the assessing officer to deal with the same, and thereafter, take next s....
A breach of natural justice occurs when an assessment order is finalized before the noticee's response deadline, invalidating the order.
The absence of a show cause notice in tax assessments violates natural justice, requiring annulment of any adverse variations to taxable income.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.